|
Formulating Rations in Dairy Herds
James D. Ferguson, VMD, MS
Section Animal Production Systems
ferguson@vet.upenn.edu
| Groups to consider in a dairy herd |
| |
Calves on liquid diets (milk, milk replacer) |
birth to (1.5) 2 months of age |
| |
|
Isometric mammary growth |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Heifers 2 months to 6 months of age |
developing rumen and growth |
| |
|
|
|
Isometric >> allometric mammary growth |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Heifers 6 months to puberty and breeding |
growth rate |
| |
|
|
|
allometric to 10-12 months (puberty) |
| |
|
|
|
Isometric growth to 3 m of gestation |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Heifers pregnant to 2 months prior to calving continued growth |
allometric 3 m gestation to calving |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Lactating cows |
production grouping |
| |
|
Age grouping |
first versus 2 lactation |
| |
|
Production grouping |
|
| |
|
|
Lactating cows |
high production (150 days) |
| |
|
|
Lactating cows |
mid to low production (>150 days) |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Dry cows – far off |
210 to260 days gestation |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Dry cows – close-up |
three weeks prior to calving |
| |
|
|
|
Springing heifers |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Transition cows |
3 weeks prior to 4 weeks postcalving |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Feeding Methods |
| |
Total Mixed Ration (TMR) |
all feed ingredients mixed together |
| |
Cafeteria style |
most feed ingredients fed separately |
| |
TMR top dress |
TMR formulated to a moderate production level |
| |
|
|
top dress grain depending on production above moderate level |
| |
|
|
|
| TMR – group fed rations |
| |
Blended delivery of feed ingredients |
| |
|
Each mouthful is “balanced” |
| |
Feed groups of cows efficiently |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cannot handle long dry material (hay) without chopping to mix in TMR |
| |
|
Moisture level ideally 40% to 60% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Challenge is to formulate for representative production levels (milk and growth) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Feeding sheet for amounts of feeds to add |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sensitivity of mixing scales for amounts added for group |
| |
|
1, 5, 10 lb sensitivity is typical for most scales |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
lbs/cow x number of cows = lbs to add |
| |
|
|
amount to add by front end loader, skid steer or bucket |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
How many production groups are being fed and managed depends on housing system |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cafeteria style – individual cow feeding systems |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
All ingredients fed separately |
| |
|
Weigh each ingredient for each cow |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Feeding sequence is important |
| |
|
Forage before concentrate |
| |
|
Feed energy concentrate with protein concentrate |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Feed to milk production |
| |
|
Often a feed chart from 40/50 lbs to 120 lbs of milk in 10 lb increments |
| |
|
“Floating” forage which is fed free choice |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Older systems would offer forage free choice from a bunk, or graze cattle and then offer grain at milking from parlor feeders. A conveyor belt would run forage out to a feed manger. |
| |
Calibrate feed offered per time of unloading. Hay offered free choice from a hay feeder. Cattle on pasture. |
| |
Forage intake free choice. Then supplement in parlor at milking. |
| |
|
Maximum intake in parlor about 10 lbs of grain at a milking |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Combination – base TMR formulated to a moderate milk level |
| |
Top dressed with energy and protein supplements to a higher production level |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Housing system influences feeding method |
| |
Tie stall barn – individual cow feeding or a TMR or combination |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Group system – need to feed a TMR or forage from a manger |
| |
|
Production levels and age groups |
| |
|
Physical facility determines group possible |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Water – one waterer per 20 cows |
| |
- Consumption greatest after milking
|
| |
|
- 30% to 50% of daily water intake within 1 hour of milking |
| |
|
- Daily drinking time is as little as 7 minutes to 40 minutes a day |
| |
|
|
>>Depends on flow rate: 1.2 to 6.5 gallons/minute |
| |
- 4 to 5 lbs of water/lb of milk
|
| |
|
- 8.34 lbs/gallon; 7.48 gallons/cubic foot |
| |
- 9 to 13 gallons to support maintenance (1.08 to 1.56 lbs)
|
| |
|
- 3.785 liters/gallon |
| |
- influenced by temperature, milk production, dry matter intake, and Na content
|
| |
|
- 1.45 l / kg of milk (1.45 lb/lb milk) |
| |
|
- 4.39 l / kg dmi (4.39 lb/lb dmi) |
| |
|
- 1.20 l / C increase in minimum temp |
| |
|
- 0.11 l / g Na in diet |
| |
- 1 water bowl per 10 to 20 cows
|
| |
- 2 waterers / loafing area
|
| |
- Rate - 4 - 15 l /min consumption rate
|
| |
- Adequate linear feet and refill rate
|
| |
|
- waterers - 5 cm/cow length with a 90 cm height |
| |
|
>>1.2 to 3.6 linear inches/cow (2 inches/cow) |
| |
|
|
- 2 feet of tank space/20 cows
|
| |
|
>>Height of waterer 24 to 32 inches |
| |
|
>>Water depth a minimum of 3 inches |
| |
|
>>Waterer within fifty feet of feed bunk and milking parlor exit |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Energy density of lactating diets |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
You typically balance a TMR ration to an energy density to support a level of production |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
This will be represented as what level of production is this ration balanced to? |
| |
|
|
For example select a production level: 90 lbs, 70 lbs, |
| |
|
|
A representative animal description is used to describe the cow |
| |
|
|
|
An average body weight |
| |
|
|
Production is described by milk production and average milk composition |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
A target days in milk and days of gestation is described |
| |
|
|
An age, a representative lactation number, is chosen |
| |
|
|
|
1st or 2nd usually |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
How to choose a target milk production to formulate to |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Challenge what to select for high milk production |
| |
|
You don’t want to underfeed and diminish peak milk production |
| |
|
You don’t want to overfeed or supply excessive NFC and low NDF |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Maintain adequate forage and NDF and provide sufficient energy |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Some strategies to select production target |
| |
|
|
Lead factor |
| |
|
|
|
Mean production of cows in the group and add one SD |
| |
|
|
Balance group to average production at third test day |
| |
|
|
Peak production minus 20 lbs |
| |
|
|
Choose 80 to 95 lbs as target |
| |
Middle to low group |
| |
|
20 to 25 lbs lower than high group |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Protein density will depend on the level of production balanced for |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ranges in NDF, NFC, SP |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NDF |
Minimum |
NRC 26 to 28% |
| |
|
- Rather low when chopped forages are in diet |
| |
|
- We target 30 to 32% as minimum with chopped forages |
| |
|
Maximum |
34 to 36% to high producers |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Maximum NDF intake is expressed as a % of body size by some |
| |
|
|
| |
Guidelines outlined by Chase |
|
|
| |
Production level
(4% FCM, lb) |
Max NDF
% of BWT |
Dietary NDF
(% DM) |
| |
Nonlactating |
1.12 |
59 |
| |
0 to 31 |
1.10 |
47 |
| |
31 to 46 |
1.10 |
40 |
| |
46 to 64 |
1.10 |
35 |
| |
64 to 80 |
1.10 |
31 |
| |
>80 |
1.10 |
28 |
| |
|
| |
Dietary NDF based on 75% NDF from forage |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Maximum will vary with level of production and other cow groups |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Other considerations to ensure adequate fiber |
| |
|
|
% forage NDF in ration – usually at least 75% of NDF from forage |
| |
|
|
|
21% of forage NDF in DM |
| |
|
|
% physically effective NDF (peNDF) – 22% of DM |
| |
|
|
|
% NDF retained on a 1.18 mm sieve |
| |
|
|
|
|
Considered size at which material passes from the Rumen (Mertens JDS 80:1463-1481; 1997) |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Retained on |
| |
Feed |
NDF (%) |
1.18 sieve |
peNDF |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Standard |
100 |
1.00 |
100.0 |
|
| |
Grass hay |
65 |
0.98 |
63.7 |
|
| |
Legume hay |
50 |
0.92 |
46.0 |
|
| |
Legume hylg |
50 |
0.82 |
41.0 |
|
| |
Legume hylg |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Fine Chop |
50 |
0.67 |
33.5 |
|
| |
Corn Silage |
51 |
0.81 |
41.5 |
|
| |
Brewers grain |
46 |
0.18 |
8.3 |
|
| |
Corn, ground |
9 |
0.48 |
4.3 |
|
| |
SBM |
14 |
0.23 |
3.2 |
|
| |
Soybean hulls |
67 |
0.03 |
2.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
No standard method of measurement is a problem |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
| peNDF and % fat in milk |
| (from Mertens JDS 1997) |
| 3.4% fat corresponds to a peNDF of 18.6% peNDF |
| |
|
 |
Rumen pH of 5.9 is associated with a peNDF of 18.5% |
| |
|
| |
|
Forage % of DM – another method to ensure adequate rumen mat |
| |
|
|
40% to 65% of total ration DM |
| |
|
|
Depends on forage quality how high forage inclusion may be |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NFC – nonfiber carbohydrate in the ration |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Calculated value by difference |
| |
|
|
(100-NDF-EE-CP-Ash) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Starch, sugars, water soluble fiber, and silage acids |
| |
|
|
Except silage acids, all are rapidly fermented in rumen |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Maximum |
typically 40% of DM to reduce risk of rumen upset |
| |
|
|
|
May go up to 45% under certain conditions |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Minimum |
typically 35% in lactating rations |
| |
|
|
|
Need sufficient NFC to drive rumen microbial synthesis |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Processing – as for NDF the processing of NFC is important |
| |
|
|
|
In general finer not coarser increases rumen digestion |
| |
|
|
|
Steam processing can improve rumen fermentation |
| |
|
|
|
Depends on source of grain what is appropriate process |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
In addition to NFC, consider starch and sugar content |
| |
|
|
|
Starch |
23 to 28% of DM |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sugar |
3 to 10% of DM |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Protein |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Goal is to provide sufficient metabolizable protein and minimize wastage from excess ammonia produced in the rumen |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Protein needed in the diet will depend on efficiency of carbohydrate fermentation in the rumen |
| |
|
|
Rumen degradable protein |
| |
|
|
|
Soluble protein plus “B” protein fraction |
| |
|
|
|
|
“B” fraction has a moderate rate of protein degradation |
| |
|
|
|
Soluble protein 25% to 35% of CP |
| |
|
|
|
|
Below 25%, may not have sufficient rapidly available ammonia |
| |
|
|
|
|
Above 30%, may have too much excess ammonia |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Rumen undegradable protein |
| |
|
|
|
Sufficient amount to complement microbial protein production |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Essential amino acids: methionine and lysine as percent of MP |
| |
|
|
|
Methionine: 2.05% of MP or higher |
| |
|
|
|
Lysine: 6.57% of MP 0r higher |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
CPMDairy |
| |
|
|
|
Rumen ammonia and peptide N balance 115% to 125% |
| |
|
|
|
Can cover over 125%, but wastage of Nitrogen will be increased |
| |
|
|
|
Check urea cost on the metabolism page in CPMDairy |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Least cost formulation |
| |
|
Allow the computer program to determine feed inclusion |
| |
|
Limit the amount of certain feed ingredients to a maximum based on palatability and availability |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
for example, maximum amount of silage may depend on feed inventory suggestions |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
minimum |
maximum |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
DMI ranges |
95 |
105 |
% of requirement |
| |
|
|
ME |
100 |
100 |
% of requirement |
| |
|
|
MP |
100 |
100 |
% of requirement |
| |
|
|
NDF |
30 |
34 |
% of DM |
| |
|
|
Starch |
23 |
28 |
% of DM |
| |
|
|
Forage |
45 |
60 |
% of DM |
| |
|
|
Peptides |
110 |
125 |
% of requirement |
| |
|
|
Ammonia |
110 |
125 |
% of requirement |
| |
|
|
Methionine |
85 |
100 |
% of Rulquin ratio |
| |
|
|
Lysine |
92 |
100 |
% of Rulquin ratio |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Minerals and vitamins |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Provide sufficient content: % and ppm of diet |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
When formulating, include “vitmin” as a feed ingredient to allow room to add minerals when other ingredients have been accounted for to supplement needed minerals and vitamins |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Supplement macro minerals after feed ingredients have been calculated to meet requirements and ration content
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Add trace minerals and vitamins as if no amounts from feed ingredients |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
always add .5% DM salt |
| |
|
always offer white salt free choice either as a block or loose from a tub |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Additives |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
This is always a difficult choice – what additive should you use |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Always |
| |
|
|
Sodium bicarbonate: 0.5% of total ration dry matter |
| |
|
|
Magnesium oxide: 1/3 of bicarbonate addition |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Strong consideration |
| |
|
|
Ionophore such as rumensin 350 mg/cow/day |
| |
|
|
|
Especially in close-up and transition cows |
| |
|
|
Yeast – improve NDF digestibility |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Others – you’re on your own |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As target milk increases, NDF (and ADF) decreases, energy density and RUP both increase, starch and CP change in a nonlinear fashion. Keeping DMI to model prediction and limiting NFC to 40%. |
| At 85 lb of millk, fat sources must be allowed to enter solution, or NFC increased to 43.9% and starch to 30.8% of ration DM. At 105 lb of milk, MP must be overfed; at 115 lb of milk, NFC and starch must be allowed to go above limits and rumen N balance to drop to 100%. This is with good to excellent forages. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Target energy density – suggested high group targets: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lactation 1 |
|
Lactation 2 |
|
milk, lb |
|
|
|
|
| 15,000 |
0.73 |
18,000 |
0.76 |
75 |
|
|
| 18,000 |
0.76 |
21,000 |
0.78 |
85 |
|
|
| 20,000 |
0.78 |
23,000 |
0.80 |
100 |
|
|
| 22,000 |
0.80 |
25,000 |
0.81 |
105 |
|
|
| 24,000 |
0.81 |
27,000 |
0.82 |
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Over |
0.77 mcal/lb, need to include fat |
| |
0.81 mcal/lb, need to include fat and increase NFC and starch, or overfeed RUP |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| These were calculated with excellent forages |
|
|
|
 |
|