Carbohydrate Fractions in Dairy Rations
James D. Ferguson, VMD, MS
University of Pennsylvania
School of Veterinary Medicine
In General the Typical Dairy Ration is:
- 70% Carbohydrate (CHO)
- 18% Crude Protein (CP)
- 5% Fat (EE)
- 7% Ash (ASH)
- TC = 100 - (CP + EE + Ash)
Goal: Provide low fill, highly fermentable diets that result in consistent ruminal fermentation over time (M. Allen)
- Low fill – maximize DMI
- Highly fermentable – maximize microbial synthesis maximize available energy
- Consistent over time - minimize variation in rumen pH
- consistent absorbed nutrients for milk synthesis and liver function
Form and type of CHO in diet has a major impact on all the above
Often the primary feeding management problem on dairy farms is blending and mixing carbohydrate sources to achieve the above goal.
Problems may relate to:
- The total amount of CHO in the diet ; Chemical content of CHO in the diet
- Type of CHO - Structural versus Nonstructural; Not all CHO has the same fermentation pattern/rate in the rumen
- Physical form; particle size and processing of the CHO
- Sequence of feeding - component fed herd; Forage --> concentrates and amount per feeding
Production and health problems associated with CHO feeding:
- Low Butterfat Test
- Laminitis / foot problems
- Low/irregular dry matter intake
- Ketosis and metabolic problems
- Primary rumen acidosis and secondary conditions
- rumen parakeratosis
- liver and lung abscesses
- epistaxis
Forms of Carbohydrate in Dairy Rations:
- Total Carbohydrate (Nitrogen Free Extract)
- Fiber, starch, sugars, pectins, b-glucans (silage acids)
- Structural and Nonstructural carbohydrate (fiber and nonfiber carbohydrate)
- Structural - neutral detergent insoluble fiber Hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin (NDF)
- Nonstructural (Nonfiber carbohydrate) (neutral detergent soluble); Sugars, starches, pectins, b-glucans, fructans
Forms of carbohydrate are defined on solubility in neutral detergent solution and/or acid detergent solution
Insoluble components - NDF or ADF, structural
Soluble components – NFC, NSC, nonstructural
| NDF Soluble |
NDF Insoluble |
| Non Cell Wall |
Cell Wall |
| Sucrose, sugars |
Hemicellulose |
| Starch |
Cellulose |
Nonstarch polysaccahrides
- Galactans
- b-Glucans, fructans
- Pectins * - part of cell wall but not linked in the matrix and is soluble in NDF
|
Lignin |
| (soluble fiber) |
(insoluble fiber) |
NDF solubles usually ferment at a faster rate than NDF insoluble components
Degree of lignification influences the proportion of NDF which may be fermented
Lignin content is a function of crop, hybrid, stage of maturity at harvest, weather conditions
In high producing cows, desire NDF with high degradation rate and rapid turnover (low fill factor)
Fiber carbohydrate (Structural carbohydrate)
- Source - cell wall
- structural carbohydrate
- Hemicellulose, Cellulose, Lignin
- Neutral detergent insoluble (NDF)
- Acid detergent insoluble (ADF) Cellulose and lignin
| Analysis |
Contains |
Nutritional Meaning |
| NDF |
cellulos |
negatively correlated DMI |
| |
hemicellulose |
positively associated with rumination |
| |
lignin |
negatively correlated with available fiber 2.4 x lignin = unavailable NDF |
| ADF |
cellulose |
negatively associated with digestibility |
| |
lignin |
Used to predict NeL or TDN |
Hemicellulose
= (NDF – ADF) |
|
potential cell wall digestibility |
Cellulose
= (ADF-lignin) |
|
potential cell wall digestibility |
Lignin
forms of lignin
phenolyic compounds |
|
negatively associated with digestibility |
Importance of physical form of fiber: Long fiber
- stimulate chewing
- formation of rumen mat for trapping small particles
- consistent fermentation throughout the day
- stimulate chewing for saliva production buffering
- too little versus too much
Non-fiber carbohydrate (Nonstructural Carbohydrate)
NFC - calculated value (DM - CP - NDF- Ash - Fat)
NSC - measured enzymatic value (starch + sugars)
NFC
- Calculated value
- Starches, Sugars, Pectins, b-glucans, fructans, and Silage Acids
- Neutral detergent solubles
NSC
- enzymatic assay = (starches and sugars) Depending on assay method and feed may include starch, sucrose, and fructans
| Feedstuff |
NFC
|
NSC
|
Difference
|
| Alfalfa silage |
18
|
8
|
pectins, acids
|
| Corn silage |
41
|
35
|
pectins, acids
|
| Grass hay |
17
|
14
|
pectins
|
| Corn grain |
72
|
74
|
|
| Soy hulls |
14
|
5
|
pectins
|
| SBM |
34
|
17
|
pectins
|
Pectins are readily fermentable in the rumen and total tract digestibility is high. However, rate of fermentation of pectins decreases as rumen pH declines, unlike for starches, therefore they may be somewhat protective of pH decline.
Fructans ferment like starch and are found in grasses NSC may be sucrose, starch, and fructans
| Calculation of NFC |
Value
|
| a. 100 - (CP - NDF - EE - Ash) |
43
|
| b. 100 - (CP – (NDF-NDFCP) - EE - Ash) |
45
|
NFC calculated values will include sugars, starch, and water soluble fiber (pectins and b-glucans). However, the calculation can also contain non-carbohydrate fractions
CP contains NDF-CP and NDF may also contain NDF-CP depending upon the method of analysis used in the lab, so the NFC calculation may double subtract NDF-CP
In addition silages contain acids, which will appear in the NFC calculation and these contribute little to microbial protein synthesis
Therefore, calculated NFC values need to be interpreted with caution – they may accurately reflect rapidly fermentable carbohydrate sources or may not
Chemical and Physical descriptions
- chemical form- SC vs NSC: main effects
- SC - rumen pH, rumination
- NSC - microbial growth
- physical form
- SC - chewing, rumen turnover, rumen mat formation
- NSC - rate of degradation or fermentation of carbohydrate and microbial yield
Associations:
- ADF
- NeL (net energy lactation)
- correlates negatively with digestibility
- NDF
- associated with rumen fill
- correlates (-) with dry matter intake
- correlates (+) with rumination
- correlates (-) with energy content
- NDF is 8-12% higher than ADF in legumes
- NDF is 20-30% higher than ADF in grasses
Relative fermentation in the rumen:
| |
Extent
|
Rate(%/hr; (Mean +/- sd)
|
| Sugars |
100%
|
275 to 350% ; (272% +/- 83)
|
| Starch (and Pectins) |
75%
|
10 – 60%
|
Processing/type
|
(40 – 85%)
|
(30% +/- 12)
|
| Cellulose |
58%
|
|
| Hemicellulose |
49%
|
|
NDF
|
|
3% – 20%; (6% +/- 4)
|
| Lignin |
0 %
|
|
Lignin negatively correlates with amount fermented
Hemicellulose negatively correlates with rate of fermentation
Grasses versus Legumes
| |
%DM
|
%NDF
|
| |
NDF
|
ADF
|
HC
|
C
|
Lignin
|
| Legume |
47
|
83
|
19
|
66
|
16
|
| Grass |
62
|
66
|
34
|
55
|
10
|
Legume - rate is rapid, extent is limited
Grass - rate is slower, extent is higher
Higher lignin – alfalfa
Higher hemicellulose – grass
Legumes tend to lower rumen fill and higher turn over than grasses, therefore legumes preferred in high producing cow rations
Impact of rumen retention time on digestion (18 - 24 hours, legume is higher)
| Extent of NDF digestion in the rumen |
% Digested
|
| Alfalfa Hay |
35
|
| Timothy Hay |
47
|
| Corn Silage |
32
|
| Corn Gluten Feed |
42
|
| Peanut Hulls |
14
|
| Hominy |
45
|
| Beet Pulp |
69
|
| Wheat Midds |
52
|
| Soy hulls |
52
|
| Cottonseed Hulls |
9
|
| Extent of Starch Digestion in the rumen of lactating cows |
% Digested
|
| Corn, coarsely cracked |
45
|
| Corn, Cracked |
53
|
| Corn, fine ground |
66
|
| Corn, ground |
61
|
| Corn, steam flaked |
75
|
| Corn silage |
76
|
| Barley, ground |
74
|
| Hominy |
64
|
| Midds |
72
|
| Distillers Dried Grains |
77
|
| Sorghum, dry rolled |
54
|
| Sorghum, steam flaked |
76
|
Fermentation of Carbohydrate in the rumen has a major impact on microbial synthesis and flow of microbial protein to the small intestine.
10 kg of NDF Kd - 5%/h 181 g MN
10 kg of starch Kd - 15%/h 262 g MN
Balancing the rates of fermentation of starch and fiber is essential to optimize microbial flow and energy available to the cow.
Simplistically, rumen microbes may be considered as two pools, SC fermentors and NSC fermentors. However, some bacteria are protein fermentors. In addition, protozoa and fungi play important roles in starch and fiber digestion. Fiber bacteria grow slowly, 8-10 hours to double, whereas NSC bacteria grow rapidly, doubling in .25 to 1 hr.
MN, g/d = 181.581 + 89.25*OM - 4.16*OM2
Maximum rates of microbial protein synthesis per kg of OM fermented is 24.5 - 26.4 g of microbial N / kg OM digested
at an optimum level of 11.66 kg - 13.73 kg of digested OM per day or
0.30 lb microbial protein / lb Fermented CHO
requires N - 10-13% DIP as % of DM
Balance amount of fiber and available energy and protein in dairy rations to optimize N utilization and microbial synthesis.
In general:
- The percentage of carbohydrate digested in the rumen correlates with the percent of NSC in the dietary carbohydrate.
- Microbial crude protein efficiency is not effected by the percentage NSC in the ration
- The yield of microbial crude protein is influenced by the total amount of fermentable carbohydrate in the ration
- Balance the NDF and NSC content
- Slower fermentable CHO sources reduce MCP
- Rapidly fermentable CHO sources increase MCP
- Too much and too rapid fermentable CHO sources can cause rumen upsets
- The percentage of carbohydrate fermented in the rumen is influenced by the content of rumen degraded protein in the ration - especially true protein
- Microbial crude protein production efficiency is a function of the content of rumen degraded protein (DIP) in the ration - 10 - 13 % DIP of ration DM
Relationships of NDF in diets (Sauvant, ADSA 2000)
NDF as percent of DM
DMI, kg = 19.1 + .269*(NDF) - .006*NDF2
| Milk, kg |
= 34.2 -.0049*NDF2 |
| FCM, kg |
= 17.3 + .68*(NDF) - .012*NDF2 |
| Fat,% |
= 1.556 + .099*(NDF) - .001*NDF2 |
| CP,% |
= 3.31 - .000091*NDF2 |
| Lactose, % |
= 5.34 - .0093*NDF2 |
| Rumen pH |
= 5.34 + .021*NDF |
| Ac/Prop |
= -.03 + .12*(NDF) - .001*NDF2 |
Carbohydrate and rumen pH:
Maintenance of rumen pH is complex
- Salivary buffering
- Chewing
- Eating and rumination
- Absorption of VFA from rumen
- Rate of fermentation of carbohydrate
- Type of grain and processing
Measuring rumen pH is difficult
- Normal diurnal fluctuations and variation with time postcalving
- Rumenocentesis is of limited value
- Complications of deep body wall abscesses
Adaptation to high NSC diets
- Avoid sudden changes from low to high NSC ration
Maintain adequate NDF and “chewiness” of diet
Use of buffers in ration
- Na bicarbonate - 4 to 8 ounces/day
Fractions of CHO in CPM-Dairy
| |
Carbohydrate component |
Rates |
| A1 |
silage acids |
0 %/h |
| A2 |
sugars |
200 – 300 %/h |
| B1 |
starch |
17 – 45 %/h |
| B2 |
water soluble fiber
|
17 – 45 %/h |
| B3 |
ndf (available ndf) |
4 – 10 %/h |
| C |
unavailable ndf |
0 %/h |
| |
= 2.4*(lignin/ndf)
|
|
| |
|
|
Analysis:
ADF
NDF
Lignin
Starch
Sugar
Fermentation analysis – total acids
NDF 30 hour digestion – rate:
Ether extract
Ash
CP (fractions)
Rules of Thumb:
Fiber: NDF in ration
Minimum and maximum to maintain rumen mileau and ensure sufficient energy intake
Physical form of NDF – many ways to try to measure
PSU shaker box – residue on top two screens >=60%
Total NDF
Min 28% of DM Total NDF (NRC - TOO LOW) ignores physical form
32 - 35% total NDF especially with chopped forages
Forage NDF >= 21% forage NDF in ration DM; 75% of NDF from forage
Physically effective NDF: 22% of DM
Effective NDF (retained on 1.18 mm screen)
Min 22% of DM to account for physical form
Problem – how to measure this
Max
1.0 to 1.3% BWT upper limit, lower limit .85 to 1.1% BWT primiparous animals
Effective NDF guidelines
| |
% of NDF
|
| Particle Size |
Legumes |
Grasses |
CSG |
| Long |
92 |
98 |
|
| 15-20% >1.5" |
82 |
88 |
|
| 7-15% >1.5" |
67 |
71 |
|
| <7% >1.5" |
45 |
50 |
|
| 50% grain, |
0.25" cut |
|
71 |
| |
<.25" cut |
|
61 |
| 30-50% grain |
0.25" cut |
|
81 |
| |
<0.25" cut |
|
71 |
| <30% grain |
0.25" cut |
|
81 |
| |
<0.25" cut |
|
71 |
Grains, effective fiber ranges:
100% Whole cottonseeds
100% Whole soybeans
100% Whole dry corn
40-60% coarse grains
30-40% ground or finely rolled grains
20-40% beet pulp, citrus pulp, wheat bran cotton seed meal, soy bean meal
<20% brewers, distillers, soy hulls, mids hominy
Nonstructural carbohydrate:
Minimum and maximum (NFC % of DM)
30-40% of ration dry matter
24-30% of DM as sugars and starches
3 - 5% sugars (5 - 10%)
19 - 27% starch
19% is too low for high producers
27% upper limit
40 - 45% of DM with high haycrop silage rations or a lot of by product feeds
Processing:
rapid fermentation:
finely ground HMSC or HMEC
barley, wheat,
steam flaked corn
roasted corn
sorghum – need to steam flake
Trouble shooting
Observe chewing activity
More than an hour after eating
50% to 75% of cows chewing
Observe manure
Looseness/tightness
Grain/fiber presence
PSU analysis of TMR
5 – 10 % on top screen (>19 mm)
40 – 55% on second screen (8 to 19 mm)
>= 60% of ration on top two screens
More than 10% on top, potential sorting
problem
PSU analysis of forages
10 % of CSG and Haylage on top screen
>=60% on top two screens
Fat/protein inversions (protein>fat in milk)
Up to 15% is normal on any test day
If rations are too fine:
Multiple options may be taken. One of or combinations of any of the below.
Feed more total forage
Add chopped hay/long material
Utilize nonforage fiber sources
Increase total NDF
Feed more frequently and push up feed more often
Guidelines for NDF and NFC
| |
NDF
|
NFC
|
| Lactating Cows |
Min
|
Max
|
Min
|
Max
|
| Early |
30
|
36
|
38
|
42
|
| 90+ |
30
|
36
|
38
|
42
|
| 70 |
32
|
36
|
37
|
42
|
| 50 |
35
|
39
|
32
|
40
|
| 30 |
38
|
42
|
33
|
38
|
| Far-off dry cows |
42
|
50
|
30
|
33
|
| Close-up dry cows |
42
|
47
|
32
|
36
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Heifers, body weight, 1.8 lbs gain/day |
|
|
| 450 |
40
|
38
|
| 650 |
44
|
34
|
| 890 |
44
|
34
|
| 1100 |
40
|
36
|
| |
|
|
NDF NFC
Min Max Min Max
Lactating cows
Early/ 30 36 38 42
90+ 30 36 38 42
70 32 36 37 42
50 35 39 32 40
30 38 42 33 38
Far-off dry cows 42 50 30 33
Close-up dry cows 42 47 32 36
Heifers, body weight, 1.8 lbs gain/day
450 40 38
650 44 34
890 44 34
1100 40 36